MSPs want to know whether the public, including groups who may be directly impacted by the new law, support the proposals, or whether some parts of the bill could be changed.

In the bill, age is added to the characteristics which already receive extra protections from hate crimes (which are disability, race, religion, sexual orientation, and transgender identity). The bill also leaves open the possibility to add ‘variations in sex characteristics’ at a later date.

In addition to adding age and bringing together the different bits of legislation which all apply in this area at present into a single law, the proposals: create a new offence of ‘stirring up hatred’ against any of these groups; and, abolish the offence of blasphemy

Justice Committee convener, Margaret Mitchell MSP, said: “Offences motivated by hatred or prejudice have been more harshly treated by courts for a number of years, and committee members broadly support extra protections for vulnerable groups.

“Certainly aspects of this bill, such as bringing together the various different laws into one place seem eminently sensible, and a way to remove anomalies.

“However, this bill needs careful consideration. While there are clear cut examples of hate crimes, there are also trickier cases. Making sure the law strikes the right balance, protecting those who fall victim to crime because of the prejudice of others while also protecting the freedom of thought and expression of all citizens, is the task that lies before us.

“These issues are not easy or straightforward and will outlast the current Covid-19 pandemic. It is crucial that they get the close attention and parliamentary scrutiny they deserve.

“The committee wants to hear from Scottish society about whether they agree this bill the best way to achieve those aims. Does it give the right protections, are any groups overlooked, or could there be any unintended consequences? These are the issues we want to look at in depth as we examine this new legislation.”