Churches claim Scottish government’s new land register will cause ‘significant difficulty’
A new Scottish government register of who has a control over land has been criticised by Church leaders for the way it has been organised.
The Register of Controlled Interest in Land has been set up in such a way as to create “unmanageable administrative burdens for local congregations”.
Church leaders have said the register will particularly affect the Church of Scotland, Scottish Episcopal Church, United Reformed Church and others due to the way they are structured internally and because of the number of churches, halls, manses and glebes which are covered by the legislation.
Rev Fiona Smith, the Kirk’s Principal Clerk said: “We’ve nothing against the principle of the register, indeed many Churches have been supportive of land reform and increased transparency for a very long time. It is the way the new register has been designed that will cause significant difficulty for Churches and congregations to comply.
“It is likely to cost tens if not hundreds of thousands of pounds in legal and administrative costs. It will require additional effort and energy from volunteers, which is going to make it harder for us to retain and recruit people. It imposes criminal penalties, for a failure to provide information to the register, on people who will not know that they have this duty.
“Overall it is going to have a hugely detrimental impact on our ability to serve Scotland’s communities, and money that could be used for help with sustaining community and congregational life or to support people struggling against poverty will instead have to go on administration and legal advice.
“Our attempts to have the disproportionate impact of this legislation recognised by the Scottish government have so far fallen on deaf ears.”
Bob Christie, chair of trustees of the Synod of Scotland of the United Reformed Church, added: “It is so disappointing that the Scottish government have failed to acknowledge the impact that the register as it is currently drawn up will have on our Churches.
“We want to work with them to make the register as useful and complete as possible, and have made a number of realistic and workable suggestions that would not add disproportionate or extensive burden to our volunteers or add a great deal of new work for our staff. It is with regret that we note that our proposals have not been accepted, and we are deeply frustrated that we have not been given any explanation or reasons from the Scottish government, or recognition from them that this new change will substantially impair our work.
“The Scottish government claim they value and respect the work of faith groups in contributing to cohesive and connected communities, and in providing social care to some of our most vulnerable citizens, but on this issue they are making our lives immeasurably more complicated and costly. They are also simultaneously imposing two different transparency regimes on us and we do not see any evidence of joined-up thinking about this.
“Our congregations are becoming subject to new transparency requirements under the Charities Bill which is currently going through the Scottish Parliament, and on this basis should have the same exemption from the requirement to register as is currently enjoyed by Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisations.”
The Scottish Parliament will be asked to extend the deadline for compliance by 12 months to spring 2024. The Churches say however that it is not more time that is needed, but a rethink of how they can best and most easily be included in the register.
The Church of Scotland’s chief officer, Dave Kendall said: “We have not asked for more time, and an extension of the deadline does not in any way address our concerns about the implications of introducing this deeply flawed legislation in its current form. Even at this late stage we urge the Scottish government to reconsider, and for those who will be affected – especially clergy/treasurers/session clerks - we encourage them to raise this failure of statecraft to engage and address our concerns with their MSPs as soon as possible.”