Douglas Cusine said: “The suggestion of having a specific offence of stealing a dog is bizarre. The existing law covers this and an accused could be put on indictment which could result in five years in prison. Furthermore, why single out dogs?

“The theft of the household cat, goldfish, rabbit, hamster, or python to name but a few could be equally traumatic, even if they do not come not come into the ‘man’s best friend’ category. If this bill sees itself enacted, discrimination against them should also be be illegal. Are wally dugs covered?

“Perhaps the Scottish Parliament could turn its attention to enacting some of the unimplemented reports of the Scottish Law Commission, e.g. on the law of succession which I would venture to suggest is more important than the theft of a dog, however beloved it might be.”

Kevin Drummond was equally underwhelmed by the consultation.

He commented: “To some insensitive people a fishing rod is just a stick. To others, like myself, a fishing rod is a friend who has shared my travels, my triumphs and my disasters. I had one stolen once. It was about 30 years ago but the pain is still with me. How could anyone just forget a Sharpes three piece split cane rod as if it was no more than a stick?

“I write in an attempt to gain support for the protection of law for fishing rods. I know they are already protected but such a law would serve to remind the public of the trauma which is experienced by owners when a rod is stolen and require the police to record them separately. Five years’ imprisonment for the theft of a rod scarcely seems enough but it could be a starter for ten.

“I am confident that, with sufficient support, Holyrood could find time for this vital legislation.”