Arrow left dark
Newsletter icon SUBSCRIBE

Liberty seeks judicial review of Snoopers’ Charter

Clock icon Reading time: 3 minutes

Martha Spurrier

Liberty is launching a legal challenge to the Investigatory Powers Act – legislation that allows the state monitor everybody’s web history and email, text and phone records, and hack computers, phones and tablets on an industrial scale.

Liberty is seeking a High Court judicial review of the core bulk powers in the “Snoopers’ Charter” – and is calling on the public to help it take on the challenge by donating via crowdfunding platform CrowdJustice.

Martha Spurrier, director of Liberty, said: “Last year, this government exploited fear and distraction to quietly create the most extreme surveillance regime of any democracy in history. Hundreds of thousands of people have since called for this act’s repeal because they see it for what it is – an unprecedented, unjustified assault on our freedom.

“We hope anybody with an interest in defending our democracy, privacy, press freedom, fair trials, protest rights, free speech and the safety and cybersecurity of everyone in the UK will support this crowdfunded challenge, and make 2017 the year we reclaim our rights.”

Liberty will seek to challenge the lawfulness of the following powers, which it believes breach the public’s rights:

  • Bulk hacking – the act lets police and agencies access, control and alter electronic devices like computers, phones and tablets on an industrial scale, regardless of whether their owners are suspected of involvement in crime – leaving them vulnerable to further attack by hackers.

  • Bulk interception – the act allows the state to read texts, online messages and emails and listen in on calls en masse, without requiring suspicion of criminal activity.

  • Bulk acquisition of everybody’s communications data and internet history – the act forces communications companies and service providers to hand over records of everybody’s emails, phone calls and texts and entire web browsing history to state agencies to store, data-mine and profile at its will.

  • This provides a goldmine of valuable personal information for criminal hackers and foreign spies.

  • “Bulk personal datasets” – the act lets agencies acquire and link vast databases held by the public or private sector. These contain details on religion, ethnic origin, sexuality, political leanings and health problems, potentially on the entire population – and are ripe for abuse and discrimination.

    • Liberty’s challenge comes just weeks after a landmark ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rendered core parts of the Investigatory Powers Act effectively unlawful.In a challenge to the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act (DRIPA) by MP Tom Watson, represented by Liberty, the CJEU ruled the UK government was breaking the law by indiscriminately collecting and accessing the nation’s internet activity and phone records.

    DRIPA forced communications companies to store records of everybody’s emails, texts, phone calls and internet communications and let hundreds of public bodies grant themselves access with no suspicion of serious crime or independent sign-off.

    Share icon
    Share this article: